NO MATTER WHAT the story, DO NOT get vaccinated, a new bioweapon is being distributed via vaccines

This report has been updated to address Google Book’s posting of a 1971 release of the New Scientist, which has pictures of the phage below in it. To see this update Click here. Even if Google books is not disinfo in this case (which it very well could be because this topic is so important), the remainder of the phage report is BANG ON, phages are what Israel has chosen to use for the race specific bioweapon and because Google Books is not print, it does not satisfy the demand: SHOW ME ON PAPER WITH AN ORIGINAL RELEASE.


I challenge ANYONE, ANYONE AT ALL, to come up with a printed book from the 1990′s that has the six legged T4 (proven Israeli Nanobot) bacteriophage in it, as pictured to the left. The web can be faked with ease AND THEREFORE GOOGLE BOOKS DOES NOT CUT IT. You cannot fake print. Let’s see it ON PAPER, in unchangeable print from the 1990′s. PRINT OR THIS THING CAME FROM AN ISRAELI LAB IN 2007, as I state and present compelling evidence for in the T4 nanobot report below.

There have been many reports about nanobots being developed that will destroy people. This report actually identifies that nanobot and what it is based upon. Once this nanobot is received via a tainted vaccine, it inserts DNA into your cells which instructs your own cells to produce more copies of itself and THAT is how it replicates. And it NEVER backs off, it simply orders your own cells to keep producing it until your cells die from being over worked doing exactly that. And it’s completely verified this thing came from a lab in 2007, scroll down to the pictures if you don’t want to read a lot.

Anti vaccine alternative news web sites are being taken down RIGHT NOW, with simultaneous total purges of the Google cache within hours and I beg to question why.

Actually, there is little to question. The answer is apparently obvious. The elite are now going for a huge push to get the T4 bacteriophage nanobot and other tainted vaccine additives put into the entire world public via mandated injections AT ONCE. And I suspect they are going to use a phony Ebola outbreak to scare the people into accepting shots laced with T4 nanobots, with everyone receiving the shot within a short period of time.

More so than flight370, Ukraine, and other issues, the takedown of anti vaccine web sites right in the middle of an “Ebola outbreak” is the coincidence we should all be paying attention to, THIS IS THE NEWS, if we miss this one we are likely to be destroyed.

Anyone who is with it enough to find a web site like this one ought to know about the NWO plan for global depopulation and the establishment of compact slave cities that can be managed with ease. What better way could there be to manage a massive depopulation than a fake outbreak, with the real disease being in mandated shots, peddled as vaccines that are supposed to protect? You can bet the elite do not want to actually release something that could kill them into the wild in the form of a real outbreak. They would instead opt to use all their ill gotten tax dollars to formulate a shot and inject it into their victims, with a certain percentage of the shots being non hazardous, perhaps 1 in 10, and the rest representing the end of life for the recipient. If the disease is a managed disease that is completely non contageous and can only be received via a shot, they can rest easy while the world dies around them.

And THIS is why they are pushing vaccines so hard, and now actively working to destroy completely legitimate dissent. I am certain that my web site is only staying online because it got too well known too quickly to take down without making waves, and I am going to use that advantage to warn the people and hope for the best.



A NOTE TO THE SHILLS: What will happen if you end up with these things inside you? These are NOT Iphones, WANNA SHILL THIS? ARE YOU SURE YOUR ISRAELI LAB GOT THIS RIGHT AND THESE WILL NEVER GET INTO YOU?

With only 183K of super efficient DNA code, viral nanobots were released into the wild via vaccinations on September 22 2007 and are being peddled as a natural variant of the T4 bacteriophage. But this report PROVES THESE NANOBOT PHAGES ARE NOT NATURAL, AND WERE INSTEAD CREATED BY ISRAEL. These nanobots invade host organisms or cells and insert DNA that causes the host make more nanobots until the host organisms or cells die from overexertion producing them. THESE ARE LIKELY TO BE IN THE PAPALOMA VACCINE, FLU SHOTS AND OTHER VACCINATIONS, VACCINES WILL BE THE DELIVERY MEDIUM THESE ARE DISTRIBUTED WITH. These are most likely in Gardasil, which in fact appears to be designed to destroy the feminine emotional centers and attack the brain, and this report proves it.

If you are a headline skimmer who can’t get past the first page of reading, you had better reconsider your information gathering habits and READ THIS IN FULL.

Brain destroying Genetically Modified six legged T4 bacteriophage is a NANOBOT

Vaccines being used for distribution RIGHT NOW

Something called a T-4 bacteriophage existed before, but it certainly did not look like this.

I knew the six legged T4 bacteriophage was NOT NATURAL and that Israel did it and I found a way to PROVE IT. Click the image to the left to see how I proved it, this is NOT a hoax. Google yields NO image results for T4 bacteriphage before September 1 of 2007, and TONS for September 1 of 2008. So that is the time frame this little six pointed demon was released into the wild. And if Google is subsequently rigged to screw with this, I already have it documented, this is REAL FOLKS.

This is an emergency now, THIS is what Israel is going to use for their race warfare ethno-bomb, and the following earlier report by this web site explains EVERYTHING ON THIS TOPIC:

THIS is what Israel is going to use for their race warfare ethno-bomb.

The real threat to our future is the T4 nanobot Bacteriophage

An alarming development regarding the topic of viral phages has occurred

To provide a background on this, I have a really close friend who is a doctorate of pharmacology and an expert in the related microbiology fields. While having lengthy discussions about the future of weaponized medicine, this friend went on and on about how bacteriophages were being re engineered to attack our brain cells rather than their normal host – bacteria, implant DNA directly into our cells to change us immediately and forever change future generations by delivering a DNA payload to the egg cells in the ovaries and also to the male reproductive system. This would have a permanent impact on the future of mankind. Once this type of phage was received via a vaccination, those vaccinated would have the vaccine induced traits passed along via DNA insertion by the phage to all future generations.
Though phages (which are viruses that attack bacteria,) of various types have been around virtually forever, they have thus far been harmless to anything other than bacteria, and are even highly selective in the exact type and species of bacteria they will attack.
When discussing this topic, I raised the question WHY were they modifying phages instead of common viruses that have a history of attacking people. One answer is in the fact that phages, more so than ordinary viruses which can cross the species divide, are highly selective in their targets and are programmed to only attack precisely what they were designed to – a bacteriophage will prefer only one variant of a particular type of bacteria. For example, there are many different types of salmonella bacteria, and among salmonella bacteria, a particular phage will attack only one variant while leaving other variants of salmonella alone. In the brain, not all neurons are identical, but all are similar so when administered via an intentionally tainted vaccine, the high selectivity of a modified bacteriophage can be used to target precisely the type of neuron a sabotaged vaccine would be intended to wipe out.
Another reason why bacteriophages were chosen as prime candidates for brain and DNA modification is the fact that they are not designed to attack people to begin with, so if any make it into the wild, re infection of people who never received the tainted vaccine would be impossible – a phage would not be likely to make it through the lungs or skin and into the blood stream simply because it was never designed to breach those biological barriers. But a needle, injecting it directly into the blood stream would bypass those barriers. So the elite, who would either want us emotionally numbed, dumbed down, or genetically altered would have little to fear while being amongst their victims, even as the disease raged inside them.

I cannot stress how freaked out my friends in the medical community were over this technology, one basically said it represented the end of mankind because it was in the hands of evil people, and that it would be used to divide humanity into two different groups – one which was rendered inferior by permanent DNA replacement, with the new DNA becoming a permanent part of what is passed on through the generations.

There are two modes of action phages operate with, one is the active assault, and one is a dormant mode. The active assault type of phage, called a lytic phage would be used for immediate personality modification of individuals, and the lysogenic type, which simply invades and makes changes to DNA while leaving whatever it is attacking alive, would be used for genetic modification of people, modifications that would span generations and be permanent.

And now onto this spooky robot like six legged fully hexagonal T4 phage that now totally dominates the web – I would like to know why the people who are pulling this tainted vaccine scam off on the people have somehow made this particular variant so dominant in the public spectrum. So let me ask WHY is this thing almost completely dominant online, when MANY different types of phages exist and why no pictures of this thing were ever in Google images prior to September of 2007?

Let me take a WILD EYED GUESS. It´s a matter of national pride. A form of cult like religious orgasm. All phages depicted now not only have six legs, but they also have a star of david body. This is NOT NATURAL, BLATANTLY OBVIOUS, AND DOWN RIGHT DANGEROUS. You know what the future holds now? It is something FAR MORE SPOOKY than any micro drone – it is the brain eating phage, specifically engineered to eat your emotional neurons and render you incapable of free will. I have been told (long ago, in 2010) it is being developed as a vaccine additive to be administered under strict controls and not be something that can survive outside the body, because that certain six pointed group of individuals has the same genetics as the rest of us, so they have no doubt made it certain that their own weapon cannot leap out of the wild and haunt them.

Tainted Nightmare needs an update, because it only speaks about vaccine adjuvants. This entire phage thing is something new, four years advanced beyond that article. I suggest you take Alex with a grain of salt and watch this video, it really is dead on.

I suggest everyone save a copy of the photo to the left of a different type of natural phage, because through expungement of history “they” no doubt want to drool in a religious stupor over how their little hexagonal leg patterns and star of david phage bodies wreak havoc on the rest of mankind. And on that note, I may have stated above that the reason for re engineering a phage to do the job rather than a known infectious virus would be to make good and sure it could not spread to other people in the wild, but I can´t help but imagine that such a profoundly Jewish looking micro organism would not be selected simply for its appearances. That stupid phage has six points on the body when viewed from above, six points on the body when viewed from the side, and six legs. PERFECT, DON´T YA KNOW!
. . . . . But I am sure it is just coincidence . . . . . . . .

The following discusses an OBVIOUS test run of this nanobot.

Doctors say “it´s like your brain is on fire”

READ THE FOLLOWING REPORT CLOSELY: It is OBVIOUS the Gardasil vaccine is not for Papaloma, it is for attacking the emotional centers, and the following report PROVES IT.

“PHILADELPHIA (CBS) – It’s a mysterious, newly discovered disease that strikes mainly young women, and it’s often misdiagnosed. Doctors who discovered it, here in Philadelphia, say it’s like your brain is on fire.

It starts with personality changes, and then young women lay dazed, restrained in hospital beds, acting possessed and then become catatonic. They’d been so normal, when suddenly their lives went haywire.
“One minute I’d be sobbing, crying hysterically, and the next minute I’d be laughing, said Susannah Cahalan, of New Jersey.
My comment:
Personality changes? That is EXACTLY what will happen if your emotional centers, which largely control personality, get attacked. And HOW can doctors just blatantly state that “it´s like your brain is on fire” if they were not in on the program and had no insight into what was going on? Furthermore, IT STRIKES MAINLY YOUNG WOMEN, THE GROUP THAT WOULD GET THE GARDASIL VACCINE. They state later in this rag article that “It´s an autoimmune response, where the immune system is attacking the brain” but oh so responsibly omit the fact that it is blatantly obviously caused by vaccines administered to a controlled group, and that vaccines are responsible for virtually ALL auto immune disorders.
The fact that this is a controlled administration of an illness is proven by the fact that it is so selective to “young women”, not middle aged women, teenagers, boys, children, men or anything else, just YOUNG WOMEN. YOUNG WOMEN GET THE GARDASIL VACCINE FREQUENTLY, WHICH IS VIRTUALLY BEYOND QUESTION, JUST BY WHO IS IMPACTED BY THIS ILLNESS, THE MEDIUM THAT CAUSED THIS “DISEASE” IN PHILADELPHIA. Philadelphia no doubt got a custom batch.
Further deepening the pile of B.S. in the CBS report is the fact that the doctors called it an auto immune disorder at all. There is no way they could know that for certain, unless they knew there was a trial vaccination campaign happening locally to Philadelphia, and they assumed it was auto immune. My guess? My guess is this little six legged monster was being tested in a trial run, with a controlled group of the elite´s primary target – young women, to see how well it destroyed them. No doubt any woman who got these vaccines has it in her medical record, and they will use that record to see if “after complete recovery” from this illness she becomes the perfect wage slave they want her to be. They will no doubt track EVERYTHING she does, from the number of abortions to how many days her children spend in daycare, and how well she follows the programming inserted into her life via various media control mechanisms. Obamacare will be PERFECT for that.
“I was very paranoid and manic. There was something wrong. I thought trucks were following me,” said Emily Gavigan, of Pennsylvania.
And it got worse for Emily Gavigan, who was a sophomore at the University of Scranton. Hospitalized, and out of it, she couldn’t control her arm movements. Then there were seizures, and she needed a ventilator. Her parents were watching their only child slip away.
“It was life and death for weeks,” said Grace Gavigan, Emily’s mom.
“We were losing her. This is something that I couldn’t control,” said Bill Gavigan, Emily’s dad.
Doctors also couldn’t figure out what was wrong with Susannah.
“I had bizarre abnormal movements, would leave my arms out extended, you know, in front of me. I was a relatively normal person, then the next minute I’m hallucinating and insisting that my father had kidnapped me,” said Susannah.
Turns out, Susannah and Emily weren’t mentally ill. They both had an auto immune disease called Anti-NMDA Receptor Encephalitis, when antibodies attack the brain, causing swelling.
My comment Cool name for it – “Anti-NMDA Receptor Encephalitis” and let me quickly explain what that means. NMDA receptor encephalytis means swelling of NMDA receiving axons in the brain. Anti is spurious. It gives absolutely no indication of AUTOIMMUNE, that is B.S. The bottom line, from that terminology, is that something caused swelling of the nmda receptor sites.

And now I got my weapon, to clear the BS with

Those doctors know exactly what caused this. Wanna know why? Because they said the NMDA receptors swelled up, and there is NO WAY YOU CAN KNOW THAT, UNLESS YOU DO BRAIN SURGERY AND REMOVE SOME OF THOSE RECEPTORS TO PUT THEM ON A MICROSCOPE SLIDE AND CONFIRM THEY ARE INDEED SWOLLEN. Those doctors KNEW this was a test, and that it would CAUSE those receptors to swell up. They KNEW THERE WAS A BIOLOGICAL EXPERIMENT GOING ON, AND THEY WERE THE OBSERVERS, ABSENT A BRAIN BIOPSY THERE IS NO OTHER WAY FOR THEM TO SAY WHAT THEY DID, OTHER THAN FOREKNOWLEDGE OF WHAT WAS REALLY GOING ON. No biopsies were ever spoken of. Conveniently, the probable death part of those receptors was left out.

Anything regarding “doctors could not figure out BLAH” is smoke and mirrors, if they spat an answer too quickly someone might ask how they knew. And the fact that this subsided after a few weeks proves that it was NOT any sort of autoimmune malfunction as this article states, because autoimmune disorders do not go away in a few weeks. Something other than auto immune caused this. I believe this was a GM bacteriophage virus test, where the virus phages went in, did their job, and when complete those receptor sites were not transmitting random trash anymore because they were DEAD. END of symptoms. Dead is SILENT.

The fact that such obvious fallacious statements from the doctors made it into this CBS report without getting caught proves that CBS is not qualified to cover topics of this nature. Autoimmune disorders clearing up in a few weeks? YEAH RIGHT.
Susannah says this is how doctors explained it to her parents, “He told them her brain is on fire. He used those words: ‘Her brain is on fire.’

If you did not watch this Alex video, I strongly suggest you do, it really is dead on.


Posted by John MacHaffie at 11:01 AM 0 comments

CDC BUSTED for Burying Vaccine Related Autism Link

NaturalNews did a report about an intercepted CDC e-mail which blew the lid off the vaccine autism scam, which proves the CDC covered up the vaccine autism link. Sure enough, the report the CDC mail referred to got censored practically instantly after NaturalNews published it, but I have it here below. Perhaps this will put pressure on the censors to make this available again.

The actual censored text NaturalNews no longer has a link to:

Translational Neurodegeneration 2014, 3:16 doi:10.1186/2047-9158-3-16

Correspondence: Brian S Hooker
Published: 8 August 2014
A significant number of children diagnosed with autism spectrum disorder suffer a loss of previously-acquired skills, suggesting neurodegeneration or a type of progressive encephalopathy with an etiological basis occurring after birth. The purpose of this study is to investigate the effectof the age at which children got their first Measles-Mumps-Rubella (MMR) vaccine on autism incidence. This is a reanalysis of the data set, obtained from the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Protection (CDC), used for the Destefano et al. 2004 publication on the timing of the first MMR vaccine and autism diagnoses.
The author embarked on the present study to evaluate whether a relationship exists between child age when the first MMR vaccine was administered among cases diagnosed with autism and controls born between 1986 through 1993 among school children in metropolitan Atlanta. The Pearson’s chi-squared method was used to assess relative risks of receiving an autism diagnosis within the total cohort as well as among different race and gender categories.
When comparing cases and controls receiving their first MMR vaccine before and after 36 months of age, there was a statistically significant increase in autism cases specifically among African American males who received the first MMR prior to 36 months of age. Relative risks for males in general and African American males were 1.69 (p=0.0138) and 3.36 (p=0.0019), respectively. Additionally, African American males showed an odds ratio of 1.73 (p=0.0200) for autism cases in children receiving their first MMR vaccine prior to 24 months of age versus 24 months of age and thereafter.
The present study provides new epidemiologic evidence showing that African American males receiving the MMR vaccine prior to 24 months of age or 36 months of age are more likely to receive an autism diagnosis.
Keywords: Autism; Measles-mumps-rubella (MMR) vaccine

The above has been replaced with the following:

Abstract (provisional)

This article has been removed from the public domain because of serious concerns about the validity of its conclusions. The journal and publisher believe that its continued availability may not be in the public interest. Definitive editorial action will be pending further investigation.

NO MATTER WHAT the story, DO NOT get vaccinated, a new bioweapon is being distributed via vaccines

Attachments area
Article Found on:

High Fructose Corn Syrup……Risks



High Fructose Corn Syrup…..Risks:                                                                                      Scientists Finally Prove High Fructose Corn Syrup Risks
For the last several years, getting good answers about the health risks of high fructose corn syrup has been difficult. There has been a lack of true scientific substantiation on either side of the debate.

Although many of us suspected this stuff really isn’t healthy for us, we didn’t actually know how it was affecting our bodies.

Well, a team of Princeton researchers has now released their official findings on a high fructose corn syrup study with (not so) shocking conclusions.

The Princeton researchers had been studying not only side effects of high fructose corn syrup, but how your body reacts when it’s ingested. They discovered that rats which had access to high fructose corn syrup gained significantly more weight than those with access to basic table sugar, even when their overall caloric intake was the same.

They did two studies and here are a few excerpts from their findings:

The first experiment — male rats given water sweetened with high-fructose corn syrup in addition to a standard diet of rat chow gained much more weight than male rats that received water sweetened with table sugar, or sucrose, in conjunction with the standard diet. The concentration of sugar in the sucrose solution was the same as is found in some commercial soft drinks, while the high-fructose corn syrup solution was half as concentrated as most sodas.
The second experiment — the first long-term study of the effects of high-fructose corn syrup consumption on obesity in lab animals — monitored weight gain, body fat and triglyceride levels in rats with access to high-fructose corn syrup over a period of six months. Compared to animals eating only rat chow, rats on a diet rich in high-fructose corn syrup showed characteristic signs of a dangerous condition known in humans as the metabolic syndrome, including abnormal weight gain, significant increases in circulating triglycerides and augmented fat deposition, especially visceral fat around the belly. Male rats in particular ballooned in size: Animals with access to high-fructose corn syrup gained 48 percent more weight than those eating a normal diet. In humans, this would be equivalent to a 200-pound man gaining 96 pounds.
What does this mean to you as a consumer, chef, cook, parent and conscious adult who cares about what goes into your body? It means all these months that you’ve been reading labels and finding out what snacks and pre-packaged foods are laced with this obesity enticing ingredient (which seems like almost everything), the time has come to say good-bye. Sure a candy bar packs a punch and for lack of a better phrase, really satisfies you, but it will do more damage than eating an entire tray of cookies fresh from the oven (and then some).

This doesn’t mean you have to quit eating what you love, but it does mean that cooking for yourself and your family is more important than ever. Use real ingredients, use sugars and fats of all sorts, but the time to hesitate is through when it comes to the ever present, High Fructose Corn Syrup. As a consumer you vote with your dollar and the more we chose foods (even if they’re prepackaged) without this nasty ingredient, the better!

Read more about Princeton’s Findings from the University Website.
Here’s a few more thoughts on High Fructose Corn Syrup to brush up on what is is, why we should avoid it and even some advertisements on television telling us that it’s just fine to eat.
• Good Question: Why Should High Fructose Corn Syrup Be Avoided?
• Food Science: The Low-Down on High-Fructose Corn Syrup
• TV Watch: New High Fructose Corn Syrup Ads

(via: Princeton University)
(Image: Flickr member Pink Shebet Photography licensed for use by Creative Commons)

Sarah Rae TroverMarch 23, 2010 01:00PMTags
Food Science, sugar, health, science, high fructose corn syrup                                             ……………………………………………….Good Question: Why Should High Fructose Corn Syrup Be Avoided?
Here’s a good question from Sarah about a complicated subject that gets us all a little confused:

Can you give me the scoop on high fructose corn syrup? Why should it be avoided? Is it the same thing as bottled “corn syrup” found in the baking aisle?

For starters, check out our food science post on high fructose corn syrup. This gives some background on how corn syrup is made and the differences between straight corn syrup and the high fructose version.

There are a couple of different issues that go into corn syrup. The main one has to do with how pervasive it has become as an ingredient in processed foods in the United States. It’s in our soft drinks, our candy bars, our cereal, our condiments, and even our bread, just to name a few. Start reading the labels at the grocery store and you’ll be surprised at how often corn syrup or high fructose corn syrup appear as an ingredient!

Part of the argument for avoiding corn syrup is simply that we need to decrease our reliance on this crop. One of the reasons that corn syrup is used so heavily because it’s become the cheapest sweetener for companies to use. It’s become so cheap as a result of many different factors, including an over-abundance of corn, government subsidies, and market pressure.

Another argument for avoiding corn syrup is for health reasons. Not only is corn syrup itself highly processed, but the foods it goes into are highly processed. If you see “corn syrup” on the list of ingredients, chances are you’re looking a highly processed food product. Although it’s a matter of debate whether corn syrup by itself causes obesity and other health conditions, it’s hard to argue that a diet high in processed foods are really part of a healthy diet.

Something that can get lost or misunderstood in all these conversations is that corn syrup by itself is not really bad. Yes, it’s a processed food product, but if we’re only using it a few times a year in special recipes, we don’t feel the need to get too worried about health issues. Of course, some of us who feel strongly about the presence of so much corn in our food system also avoid buying corn syrup as a form of boycotting.

Also, yes, the corn syrup found in the baking aisle is the same corn syrup that is under so much debate. Karo Corn Syrup, one of the more popular brands, also contains high fructose corn syrup. Cane syrups and non-high-fructose corn syrups are available at many natural food stores.

This is a very very basic introduction to the corn syrup situation. We definitely recommend Omnivore’s Dilemma and In Defense of Food by Michael Pollan if you’re looking for a more comprehensive exploration of all the issues at hand.

We hope this helps! What else would you add to better explain these issues to Sarah and other curious readers?

Next question?
Related: Good Question: What Are Processed Foods?

(Image: Flickr member mbk licensed under Creative Commons)

Emma ChristensenJanuary 28, 2009 02:00PMTags
History, Politics, Questions, Healthy Living, Sweets, Baking Ingredients, Rice & Grains, high fructose corn syrup, corn syrup                                                                                                                                             get healthy
100 Hot Health Books

Natural Health Remedies

SUBJECT: One-Minute Cure For Healing Virtually All Diseases

Hi Readers,

If you’re like everyone on this planet,
you’ve undoubtedly been affected by
disease in one way or another. Either
you have suffered from disease yourself
– or someone you care about is (or has
been) a victim of a devastating disease
– or maybe even *died* from it.

QUESTION: Did you know … that there’s a
simple therapy that has been *scientifically
proven* to prevent and CURE virtually
all diseases – from minor ones like the
flu to “incurable” and life-threatening
ones like cancer, AIDS and Alzheimer’s

HINT: This one-minute therapy, which
*anyone* can easily self-administer at
home, is being deliberately suppressed
in the U.S. — while more than 15,000
European doctors have been using it to
heal millions of patients.

Discover this one-minute cure that they
don’t want you to know about by going
(Copy and Paste This Link Into Your Web Browser Bar)
It’s important that you learn this
simple therapy as soon as you can –
before it’s BANNED by enterprises,
pharma-cartels and agencies whose
incomes are affected by the
dissemination of this information.

Wishing you good health,
le123mak P.S. Hopefully you can see this BEFORE it is banned by the “medical establishment” and can learn this information which can give you and your loved ones the quality of life and health that everyone has just dreamed of.

What Is Causing People’s Weight Problems?

     The question people are wondering is what is causing the weight problems of Americans?   Why, when you go to the grocery store, is there so many overweight people?   You know people are even having a hard time getting around because of excess weight on their bodies.   These people don’t want to have all this weight on them, but they don’t know what is causing it, and they don’t know what to do about it, or how to get rid of it.   Let’s see if we can get to the root of this problem America seems to have.   Also let’s see if we can help people to gain control of their lives and their weight and health issues.   I wish people could carry on a dialogue about these problems, because maybe together we could find answers and come to some good conclusions which could help people.   This article is full of scientific research and facts provided by some serious scientific scholars.   This will be the start of an unveiling of what is happening to us here in America, and the hopeful enlightenment which will help us to make the smart choices which can change things for the better for everyone.   The first in this series will be looking at what is in our food, that needs to be eliminated, and for good reason…….MSG…Poison                                                                                                     

MSG hides behind 25 or more names, such as Natural Flavouring. ‘MSG is even in your favorite coffee from Tim Horton’s and Starbucks coffee shops!
I wondered if there could be an actual chemical causing the massive obesity epidemic, and so did a friend of mine, John Erb.
He was a research assistant at the   University  of   Waterloo  in   Ontario ,  Canada , and spent years working for the government. He made an amazing discovery while going through scientific journals for a book he was writing called The Slow Poisoning of America.
In hundreds of studies around the world, scientists were creating obese mice and rats to use in diet or diabetes test studies. No strain of rat or mice is naturally obese, so scientists have to create them. They make these creatures morbidly obese by injecting them with MSG when they are first born.
The MSG triples the amount of insulin the pancreas creates, causing rats (and perhaps humans) to become obese. They even have a name for the fat rodents they create: ‘MSG-Treated Rats.’
When I heard this, I was shocked. I went into my kitchen and checked the cupboards and the refrigerator. MSG was in everything — the  Campbell  ‘s soups, the Hostess Doritos, the Lays flavored potato chips, Top Ramen, Betty Crocker Hamburger Helper, Heinz canned gravy, Swanson frozen prepared meals, and Kraft salad dressings, especially the ‘healthy low-fat’ ones.
The items that didn’t have MSG marked on the product label had something called ‘Hydrolyzed Vegetable Protein,’ which is just another name for Monosodium Glutamate.
It was shocking to see just how many of the foods we feed our children everyday are filled with this stuff. MSG is hidden under many different names in order to fool those who read the ingredient list, so that they don’t catch on. (Other names for MSG are ‘Accent, ‘Aginomoto,’ ‘Natural Meat Tenderizer,’ etc.)
But it didn’t stop there.
When our family went out to eat, we started asking at the restaurants what menu items contained MSG. Many employees, even the managers, swore they didn’t use MSG.
But when we ask for the ingredient list, which they grudgingly provided, sure enough, MSG and Hydrolyzed Vegetable Protein were everywhere.
Burger King, McDonald’s, Wendy’s, Taco Bell, every restaurant — even the sit-down eateries like TGIF, Chili’s, Applebee’s, and Denny’s — use MSG in abundance. Kentucky Fried Chicken seemed to be the WORST offender:
MSG was in every chicken dish, salad dressing and gravy. No wonder I loved to eat that coating on the skin — their secret spice was MSG!
So why is MSG in so many of the foods we eat? Is it a preservative, or a vitamin?
Not according to my friend John Erb. In his book The Slow Poisoning of America, he said that MSG is added to food for the addictive effect it has on the human body.
Even the propaganda website sponsored by the food manufacturers lobby group supporting MSG explains that the reason they add it to food is to make people eat more.
A study of the elderly showed that older people eat more of the foods that it is added to. The Glutamate Association lobbying group says eating more is a benefit to the elderly, but what does it do to the rest of us?
‘Betcha can’t eat [just] one,’ takes on a whole new meaning where MSG is concerned! And we wonder why the nation is overweight!
MSG manufacturers themselves admit that it addicts people to their products. It makes people choose their product over others, and makes people eat more of it than they would if MSG wasn’t added.
Not only is MSG scientifically proven to cause obesity, it is an addictive substance. Since its introduction into the American food supply fifty years ago, MSG has been added in larger and larger doses to the pre-packaged meals, soups, snacks, and fast foods we are tempted to eat everyday.
The FDA has set no limits on how much of it can be added to food. They claim it’s safe to eat in any amount. But how can they claim it’s safe when there are hundreds of scientific studies with titles like these:
‘The monosodium glutamate (MSG) obese rat as a model for the study of exercise in obesity.’ Gobatto CA, Mello MA,   Souza CT ,   Ribeiro   IA.  Res Commun Mol Pathol Pharmacol. 2002.
‘Adrenalectomy abolishes the food-induced hypothalamic serotonin release in both normal and monosodium glutamate-obese rats.’ Guimaraes RB, Telles MM, Coelho VB, Mori C, Nascimento CM, Ribeiro. Brain Res Bull. 2002 Aug.
‘Obesity induced by neonatal monosodium glutamate treatment in spontaneously hypertensive rats: An animal model of multiple risk factors.’
Iwase M, Yamamoto M, Iino K,   Ichikawa  K, Shinohara N, Yoshinari Fujishima.
Hypertens Res. 1998 Mar.
‘Hypothalamic lesion induced by injection of monosodium glutamate in suckling period and subsequent development of obesity.’ Tanaka K, Shimada M, Nakao K Kusunoki. Exp Neurol. 1978 Oct.
No, the date of that last study was not a typo; it was published in 1978. Both the ‘medical research community’ and ‘food manufacturers’ have known about the side effects of MSG for decades.
Many more of the studies mentioned in John Erb’s book link MSG to diabetes, migraines and headaches, autism, ADHD, and even Alzheimer’s.
So what can we do to stop the food manufactures from dumping this fattening and addictive MSG into our food supply and causing the obesity epidemic we now see?
Several months ago, John Erb took his book and his concerns to one of the highest government health officials in   Canada  while he was sitting in the government office, the official told him, ‘Sure, I know how bad MSG is. I wouldn’t touch the stuff.’ But this top-level government official refuses to tell the public what he knows.
The big media doesn’t want to tell the public either, fearing issues with their advertisers. It seems that the fallout on the fast food industry may hurt their profit margin. The food producers and restaurants have been addicting us to their products for years, and now we are paying the price for it. Our children should not be cursed with obesity caused by an addictive food additive.
But what can I do about it? I’m just one voice! What can I do to stop the poisoning of our children, while our governments are insuring financial protection for the industry that is poisoning us?
This message is going out to everyone I know in an attempt to tell you the truth that the corporate-owned politicians and media won’t tell you.
The best way you can help to save yourself and your children from this drug-induced epidemic is to forward this article to everyone. With any luck, it will circle the globe before politicians can pass the legislation protecting those who are poisoning us.
The food industry learned a lot from the tobacco industry. Imagine if big tobacco had a bill like this in place before someone blew the whistle on nicotine?
If you are one of the few who can still believe that MSG is good for us and you don’t believe what John Erb has to say, see for yourself. Go to the National Library of Medicine at . Type in the words ‘MSG Obese’ and read a few of the 115 medical studies that appear.
We the public do not want to be rats in one giant experiment, and we do not approve of food that makes us into a nation of obese, lethargic, addicted sheep, feeding the food industry’s bottom line while waiting for the heart transplant, the diabetic-induced amputation, blindness, or other obesity-induced, life-threatening disorders.
With your help we can put an end to this poison. Do your part in sending this message out by word of mouth, e-mail, or by distribution of this printout to your friends all over the world and stop this ‘Slow Poisoning of Mankind’ by the packaged food industry.
Blowing the whistle on MSG is our responsibility, so get the word out.
Posted by John MacHaffie at 12:24 PM 0 comments                                                                                                                              Thank you John MacHaffie of www.

Microwave Ovens- Are They Bad For Your Health?




One of the more subtle EMF Hazards is Microwaves — particularly from such things as microwave ovens.  While microwaves do derive from other sources, it’s the ovens that get most of the attention for the average individual.  That’s because there’s so many of them!  But throwing out your microwave oven does not eliminate the problem.  It’s just the first and in some cases the most effective step.  

Three articles on this subject are included here: a quick “Ten Reasons to Throw out your Microwave Oven”, a much longer article on “The Proven Dangers of Microwaves”, and even a short article on the problems associated with using “Plastic Wrap in Microwaves”.  [It should be noted that the first article was originally part of the second, but is included here in (effectively) reverse order as a means of emphasis added.]  


Ten Reasons to Throw out your Microwave Oven.<>  

Saving a few minutes of cooking time is not worth any risk to your health. This report is really scary when you think of the millions of people that don’t give a thought to using a microwave (which I guess is caused from #1 below)!  [Based on the conclusions of Swiss, Russian, and German scientific clinical studies.]  

1). Continually eating food processed from a microwave oven causes long term, permanent brain damage by “shorting out” electrical impulses in the brain [de-polarizing or de-magnetizing the brain tissue].  

2). The human body cannot metabolize [break down] the unknown by-products created in microwaved food.  

3). Male and female hormone production is shut down and/or altered by continually eating microwaved foods.  

4). The effects of microwaved food by-products are residual [long term, permanent] within the human body.  

5). Minerals, vitamins, and nutrients of all microwaved food is reduced or altered so that the human body gets little or no benefit, or the human body absorbs altered compounds that cannot be broken down.  

6). The minerals in vegetables are altered into cancerous free radicals when cooked in microwave ovens.  

7). Microwaved foods cause stomach and intestinal cancerous growths [tumors]. This may explain the rapidly increased rate of colon cancer in America.  

8). The prolonged eating of microwaved foods causes cancerous cells to increase in human blood.  

9). Continual ingestion of microwaved food causes immune system deficiencies through lymph gland and blood serum alterations.  

10). Eating microwaved food causes loss of memory, concentration, emotional instability, and a decrease of iintelligence.  


The Proven Dangers of Microwaves

Anthony Wayne and Lawrence Newell

Is it possible that millions of people are ignorantly sacrificing their health in exchange for the convenience of microwave ovens?  Why did the Soviet Union ban the use of microwave ovens in 1976?  Who invented microwave ovens, and why?  The answers to these questions may shock you into throwing your microwave oven in the trash.  

Over 90% of American homes have microwave ovens used for meal preparation.  Because microwave ovens are so convenient and energy efficient, as compared to conventional ovens, very few homes or restaurants are without them.  In general, people believe that whatever a microwave oven does to foods cooked in it doesn’t have any negative effect on either the food or them.  Of course, if microwave ovens were really harmful, our government would never allow them on the market, would they?  Would they? Regardless of what has been “officially” released concerning microwave ovens, we have personally stopped using ours based on the research facts outlined in this article.  

The purpose of this report is to show proof — evidence — that microwave cooking is not natural, nor healthy, and is far more dangerous to the human body than anyone could imagine.  However, the microwave oven manufacturers, Washington City politics [aka Corporate Politics], and plain old human nature are suppressing the facts and evidence.  Because of this, people are continuing to microwave their food — in blissful ignorance — without knowing the effects and danger of doing so.  

How do microwave ovens work?  

Microwaves are a form of electromagnetic energy, like light waves or radio waves, and occupy a part of the electromagnetic spectrum of power, or energy.  Microwaves are very short waves of electromagnetic energy that travel at the speed of light (186,282 miles per second).  In our modern technological age, microwaves are used to relay long distance telephone signals, television programs, and computer information across the earth or to a satellite in space.  But the microwave is most familiar to us as an energy source for cooking food.  

Every microwave oven contains a magnetron, a tube in which electrons are affected by magnetic and electric fields in such a way as to produce micro wavelength radiation at about 2450 Mega Hertz (MHz) or 2.45 Giga Hertz (GHz).  This microwave radiation interacts with the molecules in food.  All wave energy changes polarity from positive to negative with each cycle of the wave.  In microwaves, these polarity changes happen millions of times every second.  Food molecules — especially the molecules of water — have a positive and negative end in the same way a magnet has a north and a south polarity.  

In commercial models, the oven has a power input of about 1000 watts of alternating current.  As these microwaves generated from the magnetron bombard the food, they cause the polar molecules to rotate at the same frequency millions of times a second.  All this agitation creates molecular friction, which heats up the food.  The friction also causes substantial damage to the surrounding molecules, often tearing them apart or forcefully deforming them.  The scientific name for this deformation is “structural isomerism”.  

By comparison, microwaves from the sun are based on principles of pulsed direct current (DC) that don’t create frictional heat; microwave ovens use alternating current (AC) creating frictional heat.  A microwave oven produces a spiked wavelength of energy with all the power going into only one narrow frequency of the energy spectrum.  Energy from the sun operates in a wide frequency spectrum.  

Many terms are used in describing electromagnetic waves, such as wavelength, amplitude, cycle and frequency:  

      Wavelength determines the type of radiation, i.e. radio, X-ray, ultraviolet, visible, infrared, etc.  

      Amplitude determines the extent of movement measured from the starting point.  

      Cycle determines the unit of frequency, such as cycles per second, Hertz, Hz, or  cycles/second.  

      Frequency determines the number of occurrences within a given time period (usually 1 second); The number of occurrences of a recurring process per unit of time, i.e. the number of repetitions of cycles per second.  

Radiation = Spreading Energy with Electromagnetic Waves  

Radiation, as defined by physics terminology, is “the electromagnetic waves emitted by the atoms and molecules of a radioactive substance as a result of nuclear decay.”  Radiation causes ionization, which is what occurs when a neutral atom gains or loses electrons.  In simpler terms, a microwave oven decays and changes the molecular structure of the food by the process of radiation.  Had the manufacturers accurately called them “radiation ovens”, it’s doubtful they would have ever sold one, but that’s exactly what a microwave oven is.  

We’ve all been told that microwaving food is not the same as irradiating it (radiation “treatment”).  The two processes are supposed to use completely different waves of energy and at different intensities.  No FDA or officially released government studies have proven current microwaving usage to be harmful, but we all know that the validity of studies can be — and are sometimes deliberately — limiting.  Many of these studies are later proven to be inaccurate.  As consumers, we’re supposed to have a certain degree of common sense to use in judgment.  

Take the example of eggs and how they were “proven” to be so harmful to our health in the late 1960’s.  This brought about imitation egg products and big profits for the manufacturers, while egg farms went broke.  Now, recent government sponsored studies are saying that eggs are not bad for us after all.  So, whom should we believe and what criteria should we use to decide matters concerning our health?  Since it’s currently published that microwaves — purportedly — don’t leak into the environment, when properly used and with approved design, the decision lies with each consumer as to whether or not you choose to eat food heated by a microwave oven or even purchase one in the first place.  

Motherly Instincts are Right  

On a more humorous side, the “sixth sense” every mother has is impossible to argue with. Have you ever tried it?  Children will never win against a mother’s intuition.  It’s like trying to argue with the arm — appearing out of nowhere — that pinned you to the back of the seat when your mother slammed on the brakes.  

Many of us come from a generation where mothers and grandmothers have distrusted the modern “inside out” cooking they claimed was “not suitable” for most foods.  My mother refused to even try baking anything in a microwave.  She also didn’t like the way a cup of coffee tasted when heated in a microwave oven.  I have to fully agree and can’t argue either fact.  Her own common sense and instincts told her that there was no way microwave cooking could be natural nor make foods “taste they way they’re supposed to”.  Reluctantly, even my mother succumbed to re-heating leftovers in a microwave due to her work schedule before she retired.  

Many others feel the same way, but they’re considered an “old fashioned” minority dating back to before the 1970’s when microwaves first overwhelmed the market.  Like most young adults at the time, as microwave ovens became commonplace, I chose to ignore my mother’s intuitive wisdom and joined the majority who believed microwave cooking was far too convenient to ever believe anything could be wrong with it.  Chalk one up for mom’s perception, because even though she didn’t know the scientific, technical, or health reasons why, she just knew that microwave ovens were not good based on how foods tasted when they were cooked in them.  She didn’t like the way the texture of the microwaved food changed either.  

Microwaves Unsafe for Baby’s Milk  

A number of warnings have been made public, but have been barely noticed.  For example, Young Families, the Minnesota Extension Service of the University of Minnesota, published the following in 1989:  

“Although microwaves heat food quickly, they are not recommended for heating a baby’s bottle.  The bottle may seem cool to the touch, but the liquid inside may become extremely hot and could burn the baby’s mouth and throat.  Also, the buildup of steam in a closed container, such as a baby bottle, could cause it to explode.  Heating the bottle in a microwave can cause slight changes in the milk.  In infant formulas, there may be a loss of some vitamins.  In expressed breast milk, some protective properties may be destroyed. Warming a bottle by holding it under tap water, or by setting it in a bowl of warm water, then testing it on your wrist before feeding may take a few minutes longer, but it is much safer.”  

 Dr. Lita Lee of Hawaii reported in the December 9, 1989 Lancet:  

 “Microwaving baby formulas converted certain trans-amino acids into their synthetic cis-isomers.  Synthetic isomers, whether cis-amino acids or trans-fatty acids, are not biologically active.  Further, one of the amino acids, L-proline, was converted to its d-isomer, which is known to be neurotoxic (poisonous to the nervous system) and nephrotoxic (poisonous to the kidneys).  It’s bad enough that many babies are not nursed, but now they are given fake milk (baby formula) made even more toxic via microwaving.”  

Microwaved Blood Kills Patient  

In 1991, there was a lawsuit in Oklahoma concerning the hospital use of a microwave oven to warm blood needed in a transfusion.  The case involved a hip surgery patient, Norma Levitt, who died from a simple blood transfusion.  It seems the nurse had warmed the blood in a microwave oven.  This tragedy makes it very apparent that there’s much more to “heating” with microwaves than we’ve been led to believe. Blood for transfusions is routinely warmed, but not in microwave ovens.  In the case of Mrs. Levitt, the microwaving altered the blood and it killed her.  

It’s very obvious that this form of microwave radiation “heating” does something to the substances it heats.  It’s also becoming quite apparent that people who process food in a microwave oven are also ingesting these “unknowns”.  

Because the body is electrochemical in nature, any force that disrupts or changes human electrochemical events will affect the physiology of the body.  This is further described in Robert O. Becker’s book, The Body Electric, and in Ellen Sugarman’s book, Warning, the Electricity Around You May Be Hazardous to Your Health.  

Scientific Evidence and Facts  

In Comparative Study of Food Prepared Conventionally and in the Microwave Oven, published by Raum & Zelt in 1992, at 3(2): 43, it states :  

“A basic hypothesis of natural medicine states that the introduction into the human body of molecules and energies, to which it is not accustomed, is much more likely to cause harm than good.  Microwaved food contains both molecules and energies not present in food cooked in the way humans have been cooking food since the discovery of fire. Microwave energy from the sun and other stars is direct current based.  Artificially produced microwaves, including those in ovens, are produced from alternating current and force a billion or more polarity reversals per second in every food molecule they hit.  Production of unnatural molecules is inevitable.  Naturally occurring amino acids have been observed to undergo isomeric changes (changes in shape morphing) as well as transformation into toxic forms, under the impact of microwaves produced in ovens.

“One short-term study found significant and disturbing changes in the blood of individuals consuming microwaved milk and vegetables.  Eight volunteers ate various combinations of the same foods cooked different ways.  All foods that were processed through the microwave ovens caused changes in the blood of the volunteers.  Hemoglobin levels decreased and over all white cell levels and cholesterol levels increased.  Lymphocytes decreased.

“Luminescent (light-emitting) bacteria were employed to detect energetic changes in the blood.  Significant increases were found in the luminescence of these bacteria when exposed to blood serum obtained after the consumption of microwaved food.”  

The Swiss Clinical Study  

Dr. Hans Ulrich Hertel, who is now retired, worked as a food scientist for many years with one of the major Swiss food companies that do business on a global scale.  A few years ago, he was fired from his job for questioning certain processing procedures that denatured the food.  

In 1991, he and a Lausanne University professor published a research paper indicating that food cooked in microwave ovens could pose a greater risk to health than food cooked by conventional means.  An article also appeared in issue 19 of the Journal Franz Weber in which it was stated that the consumption of food cooked in microwave ovens had cancerous effects on the blood.  The research paper itself followed the article.  On the cover of the magazine there was a picture of the Grim Reaper holding a microwave oven in one of his hands.  

Dr. Hertel was the first scientist to conceive and carry out a quality clinical study on the effects microwaved nutrients have on the blood and physiology of the human body.  His small but well controlled study showed the degenerative force produced in microwave ovens and the food processed in them.  The scientific conclusion showed that microwave cooking changed the nutrients in the food; and, changes took place in the participants’ blood that could cause deterioration in the human system.  Hertel’s scientific study was done along with Dr. Bernard H. Blanc of the Swiss Federal Institute of Technology and the University Institute for Biochemistry.  

In intervals of two to five days, the volunteers in the study received one of the following food variants on an empty stomach: (1) raw milk; (2) the same milk conventionally cooked; (3) pasteurized milk; (4) the same raw milks cooked in a microwave oven; (5) raw vegetables from an organic farm; (6) the same vegetables cooked conventionally; (7) the same vegetables frozen and defrosted in a microwave oven; and (8) the same vegetables cooked in the microwave oven.  Once the volunteers were isolated, blood samples were taken from every volunteer immediately before eating.  Then, blood samples were taken at defined intervals after eating from the above milk or vegetable preparations.  

Significant changes were discovered in the blood samples from the intervals following the foods cooked in the microwave oven. These changes included a decrease in all hemoglobin and cholesterol values, especially the ratio of HDL (good cholesterol) and LDL (bad cholesterol) values.  Lymphocytes (white blood cells) showed a more distinct short-term decrease following the intake of microwaved food than after the intake of all the other variants.  Each of these indicators pointed to degeneration.  Additionally, there was a highly significant association between the amount of microwave energy in the test foods and the luminous power of luminescent bacteria exposed to serum from test persons who ate that food.  This led Dr. Hertel to the conclusion that such technically derived energies may, indeed, be passed along to man inductively via eating microwaved food.  

According to Dr. Hertel,  

“Leukocytosis, which cannot be accounted for by normal daily deviations, is taken very seriously by hemotologists.  Leukocytes are often signs of pathogenic effects on the living system, such as poisoning and cell damage.  The increase of leukocytes with the microwaved foods were more pronounced than with all the other variants.  It appears that these marked increases were caused entirely by ingesting the microwaved substances.

“This process is based on physical principles and has already been confirmed in the literature.  The apparent additional energy exhibited by the luminescent bacteria was merely an extra confirmation.  There is extensive scientific literature concerning the hazardous effects of direct microwave radiation on living systems.  It is astonishing, therefore, to realize how little effort has been taken to replace this detrimental technique of microwaves with technology more in accordance with nature.  Technically produced microwaves are based on the principle of alternating current.  Atoms, molecules, and cells hit by this hard electromagnetic radiation are forced to reverse polarity 1-100 billion times a second.  There are no atoms, molecules or cells of any organic system able to withstand such a violent, destructive power for any extended period of time, not even in the low energy range of milliwatts.

“Of all the natural substances — which are polar — the oxygen of water molecules reacts most sensitively.  This is how microwave cooking heat is generated — friction from this violence in water molecules.  Structures of molecules are torn apart, molecules are forcefully deformed, called structural isomerism, and thus become impaired in quality.  This is contrary to conventional heating of food where heat transfers convectionally from without to within.  Cooking by microwaves begins within the cells and molecules where water is present and where the energy is transformed into frictional heat.

“In addition to the violent frictional heat effects, called thermic effects, there are also athermic effects which have hardly ever been taken into account.  These athermic effects are not presently measurable, but they can also deform the structures of molecules and have qualitative consequences.  For example the weakening of cell membranes by microwaves is used in the field of gene altering technology.  Because of the force involved, the cells are actually broken, thereby neutralizing the electrical potentials, the very life of the cells, between the outer and inner side of the cell membranes.  Impaired cells become easy prey for viruses, fungi and other microorganisms.  The natural repair mechanisms are suppressed and cells are forced to adapt to a state of energy emergency — they switch from aerobic to anaerobic respiration.  Instead of water and carbon dioxide, the cell poisons hydrogen peroxide and carbon monoxide are produced.”  

 The same violent deformations that occur in our bodies, when we are directly exposed to radar or microwaves, also occur in the molecules of foods cooked in a microwave oven. This radiation results in the destruction and deformation of food molecules.  Microwaving also creates new compounds, called radiolytic compounds, which are unknown fusions not found in nature.  Radiolytic compounds are created by molecular decomposition — decay — as a direct result of radiation.  

Microwave oven manufacturers insist that microwaved and irradiated foods do not have any significantly higher radiolytic compounds than do broiled, baked or other conventionally cooked foods.  The scientific clinical evidence presented here has shown that this is simply a lie.  In America, neither universities nor the federal government have conducted any tests concerning the effects on our bodies from eating microwaved foods.  Isn’t that a bit odd?  They’re more concerned with studies on what happens if the door on a microwave oven doesn’t close properly.  Once again, common sense tells us that their attention should be centered on what happens to food cooked inside a microwave oven. Since people ingest this altered food, shouldn’t there be concern for how the same decayed molecules will affect our own human biological cell structure?  

Industry’s Action to Hide the Truth  

As soon as Doctors Hertel and Blanc published their results, the authorities reacted.  A powerful trade organization, the Swiss Association of Dealers for Electro-apparatuses for Households and Industry, known as FEA, struck swiftly in 1992.  They forced the President of the Court of Seftigen, Canton of Bern, to issue a “gag order” against Drs. Hertel and Blanc.  In March 1993, Dr. Hertel was convicted for “interfering with commerce” and prohibited from further publishing his results.  However, Dr. Hertel stood his ground and fought this decision over the years.  

Not long ago, this decision was reversed in a judgment delivered in Strasbourg, Austria, on August 25, 1998.  The European Court of Human Rights held that there had been a violation of Hertel’s rights in the 1993 decision.  The European Court of Human Rights also ruled that the “gag order” issued by the Swiss court in 1992 against Dr. Hertel, prohibiting him from declaring that microwave ovens are dangerous to human health, was contrary to the right to freedom of expression. In addition, Switzerland was ordered to pay Dr. Hertel compensation.  

Who Invented Microwave Ovens?  

The Nazis, for use in their mobile support operations, originally developed microwave “radiomissor” cooking ovens to be used for the invasion of Russia.  By being able to utilize electronic equipment for preparation of meals on a mass scale, the logistical problem of cooking fuels would have been eliminated, as well as the convenience of producing edible products in a greatly reduced time-factor.  

After the war, the Allies discovered medical research done by the Germans on microwave ovens.  These documents, along with some working microwave ovens, were transferred to the United States War Department and classified for reference and “further scientific investigation.”  The Russians had also retrieved some microwave ovens and now have thorough research on their biological effects.  As a result, their use was outlawed in the Soviet Union.  The Soviets issued an international warning on the health hazards, both biological and environmental, of microwave ovens and similar frequency electronic devices.  

Other Eastern European scientists also reported the harmful effects of microwave radiation and set up strict environmental limits for their usage.  The United States has not accepted the European reports of harmful effects, even though the EPA estimates that radio frequency and microwave radiation sources in America are increasing at 15% per year.  

Carcinogens in Microwaved Food  

In Dr. Lita Lee’s book, Health Effects of Microwave Radiation — Microwave Ovens, and in the March and September 1991 issues of Earthletter, she stated that every microwave oven leaks electro-magnetic radiation, harms food, and converts substances cooked in it to dangerous organ-toxic and carcinogenic products.  Further research summarized in this article reveal that microwave ovens are far more harmful than previously imagined.  

The following is a summary of the Russian investigations published by the Atlantis Raising Educational Center in Portland, Oregon.  Carcinogens were formed in virtually all foods tested.  No test food was subjected to more microwaving than necessary to accomplish the  purpose, i.e., cooking, thawing, or heating to insure sanitary ingestion. Here’s a summary of some of the results:  

  + Microwaving prepared meats sufficiently to insure sanitary ingestion caused formation of d-Nitrosodienthanolamines, a well-known carcinogen.  

  + Microwaving milk and cereal grains converted some of their amino acids into carcinogens.  

  + Thawing frozen fruits converted their glucoside and galactoside containing fractions into carcinogenic substances.  

  + Extremely short exposure of raw, cooked or frozen vegetables converted their plant alkaloids into carcinogens.  

  + Carcinogenic free radicals were formed in microwaved plants, especially root vegetables.  

Decrease in Nutritional Value  

Russian researchers also reported a marked acceleration of structural degradation leading to a decreased food value of 60 to 90% in all foods tested.  Among the changes observed were:  

  + Deceased bio-availability of vitamin B complex, vitamin C, vitamin E, essential minerals and lipotropics factors in all food tested.  

  + Various kinds of damaged to many plant substances, such as alkaloids, glucosides, galactosides and nitrilosides.  

  + The degradation of nucleo-proteins in meats.  

Microwave Sickness is Discovered  

The Russians did research on thousands of workers who had been exposed to microwaves during the development of radar in the 1950’s.  Their research showed health problems so serious that the Russians set strict limits of 10 microwatts exposure for workers and one microwatt for civilians.  

In Robert O. Becker’s book, The Body Electric, he described Russian research on the health effects of microwave radiation, which they called “microwave sickness.” On page 314, Becker states:  

“Its [Microwave sickness] first signs are low blood pressure and slow pulse.  The later and most common manifestations are chronic excitation of the sympathetic nervous system [stress syndrome] and high blood pressure.  This phase also often includes headache, dizziness, eye pain, sleeplessness, irritability, anxiety, stomach pain, nervous tension, inability to concentrate, hair loss, plus an increased incidence of appendicitis, cataracts, reproductive problems, and cancer.  The chronic symptoms are eventually succeeded by crisis of adrenal exhaustion and ischemic heart disease [the blockage of coronary arteries and heart attacks].”  

According to Dr. Lee, changes are observed in the blood chemistries and the rates of certain diseases among consumers of microwaved foods.  The symptoms above can easily be caused by the observations shown below.  The following is a sample of these changes:  

  + Lymphatic disorders were observed, leading to decreased ability to prevent certain types of cancers.  

  + An increased rate of cancer cell formation was observed in the blood.  

  + Increased rates of stomach and intestinal cancers were observed.  

  + Higher rates of digestive disorders and a gradual breakdown of the systems of elimination were observed.  

Microwave Research Conclusions  

The following were the most significant German and Russian research operations facilities concerning the biological effects of microwaves:  

1) The initial research conducted by the Germans during the Barbarossa military campaign, at the Humbolt-Universitat zu Berlin (1942-1943); and,  

2)  From 1957 and up to the present [until the end of the cold war], the Russian research operations were conducted at: the Institute of Radio Technology at Kinsk, Byelorussian Autonomous Region; and, at the Institute of Radio Technology at Rajasthan in the Rossiskaja Autonomous Region, both in the Union of the Soviet Socialist Republics.  

In most cases, the foods used for research analysis were exposed to microwave propagation at an energy potential of 100 kilowatts/cm3/second, to the point considered acceptable for sanitary, normal ingestion.  The effects noted by both German and Russian researchers is presented in three categories:  

            Category I, Cancer-Causing Effects

            Category II, Nutritive Destruction of Foods

            Category III, Biological Effects of Exposure  


            Category I — Cancer-Causing Effects

[The first two points of Category I are not readable from our report copy.  The remainder of the report is intact.]  

  3. Creation of a “binding effect” to radioactivity in the atmosphere, thus causing a marked increase in the amount of alpha and beta particle saturation in foods;  

   4. Creation of cancer causing agents within protein hydrolysate compounds* in milk and cereal grains  [*these are natural proteins that are split into unnatural fragments by the addition of water];  

   5. Alteration of elemental food-substances, causing disorders in the digestive system by unstable catabolism* of foods subjected to microwaves [*the metabolic breakdown process];  

   6. Due to chemical alterations within food substances, malfunctions were observed within the lymphatic systems [absorbent vessels], causing a degeneration of the immune potentials of the body to protect against certain forms of neoplastics [abnormal growths of tissue];  

   7. Ingestion of microwaved foods caused a higher percentage of cancerous cells within the blood serum [cytomas -- cell tumors such as sarcoma];  

   8. Microwave emissions caused alteration in the catabolic [metabolic breakdown] behavior of glucoside [hydrolyzed dextrose] and galactoside [oxidized alcohol] elements within frozen fruits when thawed in this manner;  

   9. Microwave emission caused alteration of the catabolic [metabolic breakdown] behavior of plant alkaloids [organic nitrogen based elements] when raw, cooked, or frozen vegetables were exposed for even extremely short durations;  

   10. Cancer causing free radicals [highly reactive incomplete molecules] were formed within certain trace mineral molecular formations in plant substances, and in particular, raw root-vegetables; and,  

   11. In a statistically high percentage of persons, microwaved foods caused stomach and intestinal cancerous growths, as well as a general degeneration of peripheral cellular tissues, with a gradual breakdown of the function of the digestive and excretive systems.  

            Category II — Decrease in Food Value  

Microwave exposure caused significant decreases in the nutritive value of all foods researched.  The following are the most important findings:  

   1. A decrease in the bioavailability [capability of the body to utilize the nutriment] of B-complex vitamins, Vitamin C, Vitamin E, essential minerals and lipotropics in all foods;

   2. A loss of 60-90% of the vital energy field content of all tested foods;  

   3. A reduction in the metabolic behavior and integration process capability of alkaloids [organic nitrogen based elements], glucosides and galactosides, and nitrilosides;  

   4. A destruction of the nutritive value of nucleoproteins in meats;  

   5. A marked acceleration of structural disintegration in all foods.  

            Category III — Biological Effects of Exposure  

Exposure to microwave emissions also had an unpredictably negative effect upon the general biological welfare of humans.  This was not discovered until the Russians experimented with highly sophisticated equipment and discovered that a human did not even need to ingest the material substance of the microwaved food substances: that even exposure to the energy-field itself was sufficient to cause such adverse side effects that the use of any such microwave apparatus was forbidden in 1976 by Soviet state law.  The following are the enumerated effects:  

   1. A breakdown of the human “life-energy field” in those who were exposed to microwave ovens while in operation, with side-effects to the human energy field of increasingly longer duration;  

   2. A degeneration of the cellular voltage parallels during the process of using the apparatus, especially in the blood and lymphatic areas;  

   3. A degeneration and destabilization of the external energy activated potentials of food utilization within the processes of human metabolism;  

   4. A degeneration and destabilization of internal cellular membrane potentials while transferring catabolic [metabolic breakdown] processes into the blood serum from the digestive process;  

   5. Degeneration and circuit breakdowns of electrical nerve impulses within the junction potentials of the cerebrum [the front portion of the brain where thought and higher functions reside];  

   6. A degeneration and breakdown of nerve electrical circuits and loss of energy field symmetry in the neuroplexuses [nerve centers] both in the front and the rear of the central and autonomic nervous systems;  

  7. Loss of balance and circuiting of the bioelectric strengths within the ascending reticular activating system [the system which controls the function of consciousness];  

   8. A long term cumulative loss of vital energies within humans, animals and plants that were located within a 500-meter radius of the operational equipment;  

   9. Long lasting residual effects of magnetic “deposits” were located throughout the nervous system and lymphatic system;  

 10. A destabilization and interruption in the production of hormones and maintenance of hormonal balance in males and females;  

 11. Markedly higher levels of brainwave disturbance in the alpha, theta, and delta wave signal patterns of persons exposed to microwave emission fields, and;  

 12. Because of this brainwave disturbance, negative psychological effects were noted, including loss of memory, loss of ability to concentrate, suppressed emotional threshold, deceleration of intellective processes, and interruptive sleep episodes in a statistically higher percentage of individuals subjected to continual range emissive field effects of microwave apparatus, either in cooking apparatus or in transmission stations.

Forensic Research Conclusions  

From the 28 above enumerated indications, the use of microwave apparatus is definitely not advisable; and, with the decision of the Soviet government in 1976, present scientific opinion in many countries concerning the use of such apparatus is clearly in evidence.  

Due to the problem of random magnetic residulation and binding within the biological systems of the body (Category III:9), which can ultimately effect the neurological systems, primarily the brain and neuroplexuses (nerve centers), long term depolarization of tissue neuroelectric circuits can result.  Because these effects can cause virtually irreversible damage to the neuroelectrical integrity of the various components of the nervous system (I. R. Luria, Novosibirsk 1975a), ingestion of microwaved foods is clearly contraindicated in all respects.  Their magnetic residual effect can render the pyschoneural receptor components of the brain more subject to influence psychologically by artificially induced microwave radio frequency fields from transmission stations and TV relay-networks.  

The theoretical possibility of psycho telemetric influence (the capability of affecting human behavior by transmitted radio signals at controlled frequencies) has been suggested by Soviet neuropsychological investigations at Uralyera and Novosibirsk (Luria and Perov, 1974a, 1975c, 1976a), which can cause involuntary subliminal psychological energy field compliance to operative microwave apparatus.  

[Forensic Research Document, Prepared By: William P. Kopp, A. R. E. C. Research Operations, TO61-7R10/10-77F05, Release Priority: Class I ROO1a]  

Ten Reasons to Throw Out Your Microwave Oven (Reprise)  

From the conclusions of the Swiss, Russian and German scientific clinical studies, we can no longer ignore the microwave oven sitting in our kitchens.  Based on this research, we will conclude this article with the following:  

  1). Continually eating food processed from a microwave oven causes long term — permanent — brain damage by “shorting out” electrical impulses in the brain [de-polarizing or de-magnetizing the brain tissue]. [Remember!?]  

  2). The human body cannot metabolize [break down] the unknown by-products created in microwaved food.  

  3). Male and female hormone production is shut down and/or altered by continually eating microwaved foods.  

  4). The effects of microwaved food by-products are residual [long term, permanent] within the human body.  

  5). Minerals, vitamins, and nutrients of all microwaved food is reduced or altered so that the human body gets little or no benefit, or the human body absorbs altered compounds that cannot be broken down.  

  6). The minerals in vegetables are altered into cancerous free radicals when cooked in microwave ovens.  

  7). Microwaved foods cause stomach and intestinal cancerous growths [tumors].  This may explain the rapidly increased rate of colon cancer in America.  

  8). The prolonged eating of microwaved foods causes cancerous cells to increase in human blood.  

  9). Continual ingestion of microwaved food causes immune system deficiencies through lymph gland and blood serum alterations.  

 10). Eating microwaved food causes loss of memory, concentration, emotional instability, and a decrease of intelligence.  

Have You Tossed Out Your Microwave Oven Yet?  

The use of artificial microwave transmissions for subliminal psychological control, a.k.a. “brainwashing”, has also been proven.  We’re attempting to obtain copies of the 1970′s Russian research documents and results written by Drs. Luria and Perov specifying their clinical experiments in this area.  

Written by Anthony Wayne and Lawrence Newell

International common Law Copyright 2000 by

The Christian Law Institute & Fellowship Assembly

<>  Contact: <>

Updated on Tuesday, April 04, 2000  


Plastic Wrap in Microwaves  

As a seventh grade student, Claire Nelson learned that di(ethylhexyl) adepate (DEHA), considered a carcinogen, is found in plastic wrap.  She also learned that the FDA had never studied the effect of microwave cooking on plastic-wrapped food.  Claire began to wonder: “Can cancer-causing particles seep into food covered with household plastic wrap while it is being microwaved?”  

Three years later, with encouragement from her high school science teacher, Claire set out to test what the FDA had not.  Although she had an idea for studying the effect of microwave radiation on plastic-wrapped food, she did not have the equipment.  Eventually, Jon Wilkes at the National Center for Toxicological Research in Jefferson, Arkansas, agreed to help her.  The research center, which is affiliated with the FDA, let her use its facilities to perform her experiments, which involved microwaving plastic wrap in virgin olive oil.  

Claire tested four different plastic wraps and “found not just the carcinogens  but also xenoestrogen was migrating [into the oil]….”  Xenoestrogens are linked to low sperm counts in men and to breast cancer  in women.  

Throughout her junior and senior years, Claire made a couple of trips each week to the research center, which was 25 miles from her home, to work on her experiment.  An article in Options reported that her analysis found DEHA was migrating into the oil at between 200 parts and 500 parts per  million.  The FDA standard is 0.05 parts per billion. Her summarized results have been published in science journals.  Claire Nelson received the American Chemical Society’s top science prize for students during her junior year and fourth place at the International Science and Engineering Fair (Fort Worth) as a senior.  

Dr. Edward Fujimoto from Castle Hospital on the program is the manager of the Wellness Program at that hospital.  He was talking about dioxins and how bad they are for us.  He said that we should not be heating our food in the microwave using plastic containers.   

This applies to foods that contain fat.  He said that the combination of fat, high heat and plastics releases dioxins into the food and ultimately into the cells of the body.  Dioxins are carcinogens and highly toxic to the cells of our bodies.  

Instead, he recommends using glass, Corning Ware, or ceramic containers for heating food.  You get the same results without the dioxins.  So such things as TV dinners, instant saimin and soups, vegetables, etc. should be removed from the container and heated in something else.  

Paper isn’t bad, but you don’t know what is in the paper.  Just safer to use tempered glass, Corning Ware, etc.  He said we might remember when some of the fast food restaurants moved away from the foam containers to paper.  The dioxin problem is one of the reasons.  


Radiation kills.  Even “second-hand” radiation.  Avoid it.  ‘Nuf said.


5 Simple Ways to Live Healthy

Each of us has always wanted to become healthy and to live a life that will make us productive and useful. And to be able to make the healthy choices that will govern our body and life is an accomplishment that is worth pursuing for. In fact, choosing correctly is the main ingredient in order to live a healthy and long life. To some extent, we are responsible in controlling over our own bodies so that we will be able to live the life that is meant to be lived.

Doing a personal self-check to see that we are doing only the right things in our body will be helpful in avoiding those things that will be doing us nothing but the reverse. Lifestyle and habit check in order to see how fatigue we are can also be helpful. Remember that fatigue and living a sedentary life can be detrimental for us. Listed below are five of the simple things we can try to do so that we may be able to live healthy and long.

#1. Always try and breathe in the freshest air you can breathe. And it would be wise to be a nonsmoker if you want to achieve this step. Get a lot of fresh outdoor air. Do not keep on spending most of your hours, if not your entire life, indoors. Go out from time to time. When you can find a few minutes away from your office, then do it. Getting the fresh air outdoors can be beneficial to your health, and sadly enough, we tend to overlook this factor so much.

#2. Our body needs all the water we can give it. If you are not fond of drinking plain water, chances are you will spend most of your life in the dehydration stage, and this is very unhealthy. If you can drink 6-8 important glasses a day every day, aside from the coffee, soft drinks, or tea that you are consuming, then you are on the right track. Adding more water to your daily routine and regimen will help you really feel better and will give you the energy you definitely need.

#3. If you are getting enough water, it is also a must that you get ample sleep. Ample in the sense that you have to get at least 6-7 hours of it. Getting a good night’s sleep is still one of the major keys to essential help. But it is also better to take note that aside from getting a good night’s sleep make sure also that you get the right amount of that sleep. There are researches that conclude that those people who sleep for 6-7 hours are healthier compared to those who do at more than 8 hours or less than 4, respectively.

#4. Consume foods that are high in fiber. These foods had been proven to help reduce high blood pressure, in your attempt to avoid high blood sugar, and at the same time a big help in wastes elimination. Eating enough sources of fruits and vegetables will also be a huge step in becoming healthy. Some Americans have the bad habit of not eating the proper amount of fruits and veggies; this is something negative that will definitely have an adverse in the health. Let us also include in this tip the avoidance of alcohol consumption. It is okay to drink alcohol but having and restricting it to one drink a day can still be good. Another negative effect will certainly make your body unhealthy will happen when you consume more than 2 drinks a day.

#5. Of course, let us not forget the power of exercising. Those who work out regularly have been proven to be in the right track of living healthy and long. Take note that exercising plays a great part in attaining an overall good condition in our health.

These five tips here are just some of the basics that you can try to consider and do. There are still a lot more that can be done in order to achieve a healthy and long life. But remember that you don’t have to change your lifestyle drastically and completely all at once. Take it one step at a time, and if it is already a habit, then it will be good to go and proceed to the next steps. In reality, the simple steps we take can prove to be the better ones as we go on with our lives.

Hal Johnson has been writing articles for nearly 4 years. Come visit his latest website over at which helps people find information on
Mens Promise Rings and deals on all other types of mens promise rings.

Article from

Heart disease affects 20 million Americans. How can you live a heart healthy life?Watch More Health Videos at Health Guru:

More Living Healthy Articles

Top 5 reasons you should live healthy

Article by Robin Chung

For some years now a lot of attention has gone to areas that have taken a backseat in the past. Think of the environment and the push to live green. But since the 80s the medical department has made big jumps and we now know a lot of ways to live healthier and enhance our lives. But why should you? Here are 5 reasons.

5. It’s easy
Believe it or not but it’s easy to live healthy. The reason for this is because it’s a lifestyle choice and not a limitation per se. After about a week of living healthy the body and mind adjusts in a way that we wouldn’t want to go to the old ways.
A healthy portion of exercise and nutritious foods should always be on your mind. It’s not hard, just takes some getting used to.

4. Bragging rights
A healthy diet and enough exercise can help your muscles grow. Finally you can be that buff person from the movies, you know the one that gets the girl but than loses her to a smart guy with feelings. This is definitely a reason people should want to go healthy.

3. It’s cool in a different way
This point is perhaps arguable but living healthy is a cool thing these days. Isn’t it great to be different? Go to school and collect an Apple from the cafeteria instead of those insane portions of cheeseburgers. It will get some heads turning occasionally believe me. So attention seekers, go to the green side of the plate.

2. It’s cheap
It can be a cheaper life style than the one you have now. If you’re a smoker and a heavy drinker, lose those things and it can save thousands of dollars on year basis. And even for more common lifestyles it can save money because living healthy means eating “when you’re hungry”. I dare to bet that your shopping chart will be lighter to push. And not just because of the thicker biceps!

1. It enhances your life
How could this reason not win? Basically every aspect of your life -apart from some social gatherings perhaps- becomes better. You’ll have more strength and feel more energized, this results in more productivity. All in all it leads to more happiness in your life. And with that in mind it’s worth extending that life by making the right choices.

So those are the 5 main benefits you’ll enjoy by adopting a healthier lifestyle. There’re more but these are the ones that will spring to mind for most on the fence. Let me help you make the decision. And remember if you don’t like in you can always go back.

reasons you should live healthy – the benefits

About the Author

I’m Robin Chung. A 19-year-old student studying software design. In my spare time I like to write, for my homepage and novels. Please learn more about me by visiting my homepage. There you can read more articles and find out more.

Robin Chung

Find More Living Healthy Articles